Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Silver to paper, to?

I'm going to leave Obama and his vacation on the other side of the Planet for the moment.  It's unlikely he'll do anything that will cause immediate damage.  I predict he won't do much more than prove once again he's more politician than statesman.  The real damage has been done much closer to home.  With the exception of the business community, most Americans didn't pay much attention to the Federal Reserve Bank.  Running out of tricks, the Fed decided to try a last ditch effort to stimulate the economy.  They Purposely Devalued the US Dollar.  It's an old trick, in a conversation earlier Lewis, a Grumpy Contributor, who actually understands how the Money Supply Works, and who I wish I could have conned into trying to explained it, put it to me this way;

I think what's going on now with the FED does have something to do with wanting to devalue the currency to make our economy more competitive internationally. However, I believe the main reason is that there simply isn't the demand for more US debt internationally. So the FED is bailing out Congress right now. It is monetizing the debt. This will eventually lead to hyperinflation. The only reason the first round of QE didn't do that, was because the commercial banks were too afraid to lend, and they could get a safe return with US treasuries and shoring up their reserves with the FED.


Also, those commodity spikes we've been seeing recently will hit the stores eventually, full force. Probably starting early next year.

Like I said, monetary policy is very difficult to understand. Good luck trying to explain it to the masses. The best way you can put it is - government counterfeiting. That's really all it is. All states attempt to counterfeit, and devalue the currency. Rome did it by clipping parts of gold and silver coins. We're in the digital age now, with no currency anywhere backed up by anything. It's very dangerous territory. I think we will eventually see a world-wide collapse at some point.

Chipping away the edges of gold and silver coins.. The face value remained the same and as long as the Roman Empire covered most of the Civilized World, who cared.  The process also left more metal in the treasury.

In the 1930's Franklin Roosevelt took it a step farther.  For large transactions, it was much easier to carry a wad of paper money than walking around with several pounds of gold in your pocket. At the time the amount of paper money in circulation was limited by the amount of Gold or Silver in the US Treasury, if you had a Twenty Dollar bill you could walk into a bank and cash it in for Silver.

FDR took us of the gold standard, larger bills became Federal Reserve Notes instead of Bearer Notes,  this was the beginning..  The Treasury could issue tons of paper money without have to worry about those pesky redemption's.  Singles, Fives and Tens  could still be redeemed for silver.  If you're much under 50, the odds are you've never seen a Silver Certificate.  Where a modern one dollar bill says Federal Reserve Note, the old ones used to say Silver Certificate and at the bottom In Silver Payable to the Bearer on Demand. This is from Wikipedia

End of the Silver Certificates



 Silver Certificate Certificates circulated, mainly in the $1 denomination, widely throughout the United States in the years following 1934. When the '34s wore out, they were replaced with a new, more modern-looking Series 1953 (1935 for the $1 silvers; see below), with the same face changes as the Series 1950 Federal Reserve Notes had experienced. However, the Silver Certificates began to disappear from circulation during the 1940s and 1950s. The amount of Silver Certificates in circulation depended directly upon the amount of silver bullion in the Treasury vaults. As people redeemed the certificates for bullion or silver dollars, the notes were shredded, because the notes had lost their backing and could not be recirculated unless there was more silver being produced.

The price of silver was also rising. In 1960, it was nearing $1.29, which meant that silver dollars were worth more than $1. This meant that people would receive their silver dollars and melt them down for the bullion, thereby reducing the amount of silver in circulation, which was already falling.In March 1964, Secretary of the Treasury C. Douglas Dillon halted redemption of Silver Certificates for Silver Dollars. In the 1970s, large numbers of the remaining silver dollars in the silver dollars in the mint vaults were sold to the collecting public for collector value. All redemption in silver ceased on June 24, 1968.




The last time money was worth the paper it's printed on
In 1964 Lyndon Johnson was running short of money.  Like Roosevelt before him he needed to finance a mountain of Social Legislation, he also was dealing with an expanding war,  There was limit to what he could "borrow" from Social Security. which wasn't supposed to touched to begin with.  In order to increase the money supply, Treasury ended the issuance of Silver Certificates and the Production of Silver Coins. With the majority of the nations gold and silver back in the vaults the amount of currency that could be issued was limited only by

Coins became silver plated imitations and Silver certificates were replaced by Federal Reserve Notes, backed by the Government's promise to redeem them with real money someday.   With the majority of the nations gold and silver back in the vaults the amount of currency that could be issued was limited only by the amount of paper and ink available and the discretion of the Federal Reserve.

At the time the policy wasn't super inflationary because the US still had a major manufacturing base.  There was a balance of trade deficit, but Americans still bought American for the most part.  Components for Government Contracts had to be manufactured in the United States.  Vietnam ended Johnson's career and the mess was left to Richard Nixon who resigned in disgrace just before the world caught on.  Barack Obama walked into a job he wanted, then claimed to have inherited a mess.  Jerry Ford literally inherited a disaster waiting to happen.  Not only had he replaced the only President in US History to resign before he was removed from office, the inflation caused by the first oil shortages had just started to become apparent and it was going to get worse.   It was during the end of the Ford Administration that the Principle in the Social Security Trust Fund actually Declined,   That's when the devaluation and inflation that would eventually doom the Carter Presidency started..

During the Carter years if there was a way for something to go wrong, something found it. There was the Iran Hostage Situation and the totally Mucked Up rescue attempt.  Americans started finding out the Japanese didn't make such bad cars after all, in fact they'd out last, out  perform and got better gas mileage than American made cars.  American auto manufacturers suffered.  There were oil shortages, Mortgages hit 19% if you get one...  The Government literally robbed Social Security,,, they didn't even bother with the IOU's the paper balance of the Trust Fund declined thou the Cater Administration and well into Reagan's First Term,  The Fed Printed lots of dollars, but they didn't do what was intended.  By the time Carter left Office, the Melt Value of a Silver Quarter was almost 7.00 Dollars in Federal Reserve notes. In 1974 the country quit making copper pennies, they were worth more as scrap, than money.

Buy the time Reagan was elected gold was at 680 Dollars an ounce..It had been less than half that when Carter took office.   We never recovered what we lost from the Ford Administration  into the Reagan Years.  Gold and Silver depreciated, never back to what they had been, that was lost as well.  A more modest rate of inflation lasted from the middle of Reagan's first term to roughly the end of Bush Jr's first term.  The Economy took some hits, we had recessions but nothing like the Carter Years.

The Fed started tampering with the money supply again at the begining of the Great Recession, (which we've been told is over) All you seem to hear is estimates of how much monopoly money they created.  Now in order to "Boost the Economy the Fed is cranking up the Printing Press.  Lat week they purchased 600 Billion Dollars with the push of a computer button. They plan on continuing the process at the rate of $100,000,000,000 a month. They used the money to buy Government Debt and to give the banks money to loan.  The banks are already sitting on all the cash they need.  The only rational to the "Easing" is to make the ratio of debt to GDP look better and to spur inflation. Yes the Stock and Commodies Markets took a jump.  The jump is inflationary, the dollar declines, it takes more dollars to buy something,  The fed is betting the average American is to dumb to correlate the increase in his 401, to his higher cost of living.

Look around, odds are, your Refrigerator, Stove, Computer, Washing Machine and ball point pens were all manufactured outside of the US.  If the dollar is worth less the cost of those goods goes up. 

Having lived throug this once, I wouldn't wish it on anyone.

.

16 comments:

  1. Good one, Grumpy. If anyone is interested in worst case scenarios, I would recommend this blog:

    http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/

    They are usually spot on about monetary policy. One of the most fascinating things about this round of QE is the world reaction - all negative. When the rest of the world's central planners think you have gone to far, you've gone to far.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can't see how this will be anything but inflationary. Gold's going up faster than it did under Carter

    Diffinately can't see the Chinese buying it, last thing they want is to get paid back three trillion in funny money.

    In some quaters there's even talk of trying to back to a modified gold standard.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's a good link Lewis, from experiance I didn't see much to disagree with.... wish I had.

    One of the first visable impacts has been a major spike in oil prices

    God help people with Oil or Propane Heat this winter. If Heating Oil get's much over 3.00 bucks a gallon there are people who will be looking at a Thousand Bucks a month for heat. Compound that with high unemployement.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another of barry's "Unintended Consequences or "Inconvenient Truth's". Trouble is Inflation is the unkindest tax of all and hurts the lowest incomes proportionately more than the wealthy. Kinda like cutting off their nose to spite their face.

    ReplyDelete
  5. USMC, the entire fractional reserve banking system is a fraud and a racket. Legal tender laws are a complete government monopoly on money. Even supposed "free market" economists like Milton Friedman was in full support of central banks. If central planning doesn't work in all other areas of the economy, it certainly cannot work in the most important area - money.

    The idea of FDIC is also a fraud. Your money isn't there, period. It's insurance for something that doesn't exist. It's cover, to conceal their crimes, and prevent mass bank panics.

    What they won't plainly say in all of this, but should be obvious to all, is that the Federal Reserve is simply monetizing the debt. This isn't intended to "stimulate" the economy. If counterfeiting stimulated the economy, they could legalize private counterfeiting, instead of giving the FED the exclusive monopoly on counterfeiting.

    There isn't any more sufficient demand for U.S. debt to keep up with spending. If they raise interest rates to increase demand, there goes the federal budget due to interest payments. There still isn't political will to seriously cut spending, and we will all suffer because of that. I've been saving all of my relatively short life...not much good it will do me in the coming years.

    Even worse, the government simply changes their statistics to make themselves not look as bad as it really is. Decades ago they stopped including food and energy in their inflation statistics. WTF?? That's the major expense that everyone has. They're all criminals, and there's no other way to look at it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jackson had it right..."Mischief springs from the power which the moneyed interest derives from a paper currency which they are able to control, from the multitude of corporations with exclusive privileges... which are employed altogether for their benefit."

    "The duty of government is to leave commerce to its own capital and credit as well as all other branches of business, protecting all in their legal pursuits, granting exclusive privileges to none. "

    Not bad for a backwoods lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hold on a second. Why the surprise that the Chinese would dislike it? They have covered the Earth like locust pushing out any competition. Their government manipulates their currency and are so successful they are enjoying their own boom. WIth the amount of debt they've gobbled up, we all know what comes after the boom. The Chinese are talking about tightening access to the precious metals used in computers. This is a kind of reaction to the reports that the US Congress might consider tariffs on imports. It was also reported that the Germans sold some of their gold, put tariffs on imports, and the German consumer cooperated by buying German-made products, which helped their economy. It's not just the U.S. that is struggling. Economic problems are world-wide. So, critique the plan, but don't base its worth or lack of on what China or Germany think. They are protecting themselves.

    In the very recent past, US consumers purchased 20% of world goods (imports)...polluted with buy lots of junk and buy it cheap. Ole supply and demand works well in a commodity obsessed country. No wonder they don't like it! Since we've slowed down our buying, Chinese factories are closing right and left. We will be paying more and perhaps paying what things really cost. Supply and demand will kick in. People may have to save up to buy versus drown in debt. What a novel idea.



    As far as I am concerned they can keep their junk. I will buy US made as much as possible or go without.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Pure poetry, Capt.

    Just think of how many planks of Marx's communism we've already adopted:

    Abolition of private property rights (currently, the state claims primary ownership and simply lets you have the leftovers)

    Progressive income taxation

    Universal compulsory public education

    Centralization of communication and transportation

    Government nationalization of banking and credit

    We're already half Marxist, and we didn't even need Obama to get there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What you are saying, DFTTS, is that governments world-wide are fouling everything up. I agree completely.

    It's all coming down, not just the U.S. Foreign governments will simply blame the U.S. as the scapegoat, like they always do, to take their citizens ire off of themselves. Instead of taking the blame for devaluing their own currency and investing so heavily in dollars.

    No one is going to escape this mess.

    ReplyDelete
  10. LEWIS: Half right. Governments world-wide bear responsibility, but so do manufacturers and marketing firms in overdrive along with consumers obsessed with commodities. Plenty of blame all around.

    ReplyDelete
  11. So true, DFTTS. In the end, we get the government we desire...isn't that also true?

    My feeling is that the state is fading; it's just looking darker before dawn. I don't believe we will have a return to totalitarianism, like in the 20th Century. Hard lessons need to be learned, but only then will enough be willing to try liberty. This time, for real.

    The same arguments that were used against abolition of slavery, are still used against abolition of the state: it's all we've ever known, our economy will collapse without it, it's for the slave's own good, etc.

    It wasn't thrown out all at once, but slavery was abolished.

    "They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore."

    Maybe not in our lifetimes, but liberty will prevail, eventually.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Not so sure about it happening in this world Lewis.

    DFTTS Bernanke seems to believe inflation will cause and increase in comsuption people will be happy to finance, He's gambling on relaxed credit and pent up demand.. It completly overlooks the fact there is no shortage of avaliable cash (except for those who need it)but people are unwilling to part with it due to uncertainty.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Grumpy, that is the fallacy of Keynesian economics. Consumption doesn't grow an economy, PRODUCTION does. So, what are we supposed to consume now, paper notes?? Without prior savings and investment, there is no production, therefore real consumption cannot take place.

    Keynesian economics has been repeatedly discredited since the Great Depression, yet our "leaders" and their lackeys still press on. Why?? Because it's prescription is more government meddling, not free markets.

    Can you imagine any scenario where the government or its intellectual lackeys publicly announce that they, and crony capitalism have been the problem all along, and it needs to cease and desist immediately?? It will never happen.

    Trillions of "wealth" vanished in 2008 almost overnight. That isn't possible with true wealth. But it is possible with a fiat money debt economy, based on nothing.

    Unfettered free markets, profit and loss, private property rights, rights of contract, savings and investment - that is the answer. Always has been and always will be.

    In a simple word - liberty.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Grumpy: This morning's economic news reports that China's export numbers are extraordinary. It translates simply to that they are exporting in record numbers and importing vastly less by comparison. China is awash with money and this morning's report indicates their Central Bank is worried about Chinese inflation.

    The Germans went the tariff route. Our Congress seems to be considering the same. The Chinese complained, borderline threat, IF tariffs were implemented. Devaluing the dollar makes US products more "attractive" on the global market. What works? Who is right? I am not an economist, but things are out of balance.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I've studied economics for about 20 years. And it's a shame that it took a Nobel Laureate such as F. A. Hayek (who is still widely ignored by the mainstream) to explain common sense - central planning cannot work.

    There is the problem in all centrally planned economies of economic calculation. Without ownership of private property, freedom of contract and profit and loss, no central planner(s) could possibly know what is needed to be produced, in what quantities, where, and at what price.

    The most stark example of this is the former USSR. They collapsed because you simply cannot "plan" an economy. Central planning is top-down and coercive. Only the spontaneity and ingenuity of the market (millions of people making millions of voluntary decisions each day) can "plan" an economy. Free markets are bottom-up, from the consumer. The consumer is king. There are no mathematical formulas for human action, regardless of what failures like Paul Krugman think.

    Central planning doesn't work, whether it's total, or just piecemeal. Only free markets work. In every area where there is economic disruption, you will see central planning. That's all government does, that's why it will never go away. Keynesians like Bernake, Greenspan and Geithner have been proven wrong again and again. But they never stop, do they? They simply claim false credit that it would have been much worse without them, and blame true capitalism, when we don't have true capitalism; we have crony capitalism that is run by government coercion. He who has the gold, makes the rules.

    It's the same in every nation, and it will not change, until people reject statism.

    ReplyDelete
  16. DFTTS..Sounds like China might have their own version of Paul Krugman. No real debt, and high productivity are what it should be all about. Without being inflationary, surplus cash on hand can be used to make an economy grow. And the Standard of living along with the economy. Goverments can afford to build infrastructure without over taxation. Businesses with excess cash expand. Reseach becomes a tool that business is happy to fund, becaause it guareentees future growth.

    That's true wealth.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.